Fair World Project Letter to Paul Rice
Enter Email

 Watch the Video


November 15, 2011



Dear Paul,


Thank you for responding to Fair World Project’s (FWP) letter and concerns regarding Fair Trade USA’s (FTUSA) labeling and commercial availability standards. I’ve read with great interest that FTUSA is reconsidering its labeling standards and is actively engaging stakeholders on this issue.   FWP commends FTUSA’s work to expand the fair trade market.  However, as a FLO member, FTUSA unilaterally chose to ignore the FLO commercially availability requirement for multi-ingredient products which states that ““all that can be certified fair trade must be fair trade.”


FTUSA has made it clear on several occasions, including during public webinars and in the media, that the new FTUSA’s standards will not include a fair trade commercial availability requirement. Fair World Project’s concerns with this approach to multi-ingredient fair trade products are twofold: 1) the unilateral process by which this decision was made within FTUSA and 2) the implications of not establishing an enforceable commercial availability standard for multi-ingredient fair trade products.





  1. While FWP is encouraged by FTUSA’s willingness to revisit its  labeling standards and is consulting stakeholders, FWP wishes to underscore that this process must be transparent and documented, with FTUSA accountable to the larger fair trade movement and market.   Specifically, FTUSA should create an online portal for this issue, similar to the portal for “Farm Workers Standard”  (http://fairtradeusa.org/certification/standards), with a reasonable timeline for compiling and reviewing stakeholder input.   
  2. A strong and enforced fair trade commercial availability standard, analogous to FLO 2.2 or IMO 1.1.1, is critical to assure that conventional companies with little long-term investment to fair trade establish fair trade supply chains and expand the impact for producers. Without a commercial availability requirement, manufacturers have little incentive to source fair trade ingredients beyond the bare minimum to receive the FTC mark. Claiming that you will “strongly encourage” a company out of producing a product that sources only Fair Trade Certified sugar and no Fair Trade Chocolate (or other ingredients that are widely commercially available) is not sufficient. This case was stated on a FTUSA webinar with a Hot Cocoa product.  This standard must have clear and enforceable guidelines.
  3. As written, FTUSA’s labeling requirements technically allow for multi-ingredient products to carry the “Fair Trade Certified” mark so long as they reach a minimum dry weight of 25% fair trade ingredients. Without a fair trade commercial availability requirement, manufactures will be granted use of the FTC mark for multi-ingredient products with only 25% FTC content, even if their product could contain a higher percentage of FTC content.
  4. FTUSA does not have a public policy for granting exceptions or for manufacturers transitioning their supply chain to fair trade. If exceptions are granted, clear benchmarks for increasing their fair trade ingredient thresholds must be made public and within 18 months they must start to use the commercially available fair trade ingredients.    
  5. As currently written, FTUSA labeling policies do not allow for manufacturers and consumers to easily distinguish products with high Fair Trade content and those with minimal fair trade content. Dedicated fair trade manufacturers that source 100% of Fair Trade ingredients will be at an unfair advantage when consumers must chose between similar products, one with a maximum percentage of Fair Trade ingredient, and one with only the minimum. . To assure a level playing field for consumers and manufacturers labeling requirements must include a clear identifier for the percentage of Fair Trade ingredients.  Ingredients logo must be accompanied by a % of fair trade ingredients if used on the front panel.


 Thank you for your time and consideration. I await your response.  In the ongoing process of transparency we will post this and other correspondence on our website. 




Dana Geffner

Executive Director

Fair World Project



Fair Trade for Farmers and Soil

Plowing field with oxen

Small-scale organic farming and regenerative agricultural practices combat our climate crisis and help feed the world. Here are just a few of the ways that fair trade producers and their brand partners are collaborating to grow ethical supply chains through regenerative organic agricultural methods, and producing goods that we can all feel good about. This […]

The Hidden History Made at Sakuma Brothers Farms

Picking blueberries: Copyright David Bacon

History was made on September 12, 2016 with the election of Familias Unidas por la Justicia to be the union representing berry pickers at Sakuma Brothers Farms in Washington state. Three perspectives on what that means for farmworkers, farmers, and our food system. History was made on September 12, 2016 with the election of Familias […]

Food Waste, Hunger and Climate Change

Food Wastage Footprint and Climate Change, Rome FAQ

As a child, you likely heard some variation of the cliché, “Eat all your food; there are starving people in the world.” While hunger remains one of humanity’s greatest challenges, the underlying causes are not as clear as one might think. Written by Ryan Zinn As a child, you likely heard some variation of the […]

Fair Cannabis?


For decades, workers have flocked to Northern California and Southern Oregon to work the fall cannabis harvest. Some are migrants on their seasonal tour. Others are driven by an interest in cannabis culture, or by the promise of lucrative pay. While some “trimmers” have had pleasant, safe and profitable experiences, many have not. Written by […]

Sustainable Public Procurement:

Sustainable Public Procurement

An Understated and Effective Way to Grow Fair Trade Sales of fair trade products have grown in leaps and bounds, especially in Europe. While this growth is encouraging, supply from producers in the Global South is well ahead of demand from consumers in the North. How do we close this gap? Here’s a practical guide […]

Trading Down: How Unfair Trade Hurts Farmers

United States farm incomes sharply declined in 2016 for the third year in a row. Prices for wheat and corn are currently at ten-year lows, and in many cases U.S. farmers are paid below the cost of production for what they produce. While these low prices hurt U.S. farmers, when the crops are exported by […]

Grow Ahead: Crowdfunding Climate Resilience

Fair World Project is launching Grow Ahead, an online crowdfunding platform. For the first time, individual consumers can forge an intimate link with front-line farmer groups, directly funding farmer initiatives and supporting the global effort to address climate change on the farm. Industrial agriculture and food production is a major contributor to climate change, and […]

Fair Cities


    What will the just economy of the future look like? We asked for your suggestions for cities across North America that are living examples of fair trade values in action. Is yours on the list? MINNEAPOLIS/ST PAUL, Minnesota Minneapolis-St. Paul is a hotbed of fair trade activity. For decades now, local nonprofits like the […]

It’s Time for Wages With Dignity


by Ryan Johnson Quietly, hidden behind the headlines that feature presidential candidates bemoaning the state of our country and our economy, voters in several states are no longer waiting on politicians. They’re taking matters into their own hands and launching minimum wage ballot initiatives to create the economic change people sorely need. The impetus for […]

The Business Case for Raising the Minimum Wage


by David Bronner At Dr. Bronner’s, the company I run with my family, we believe that we can only prosper in the long run if we contribute to the prosperity of society as a whole. It’s why we strive to compensate all our staff fairly, cap executive compensation at five times the lowest paid position, […]