CLAC Communique on the Fair Trade Situation in the United States
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
Enter Email
CONTRIBUTE TODAY
FOLLOW US ON
FEATURED CAMPAIGN

 Watch the Video

FacebookTwitterGoogle+EmailShare

October 10, 2011

 

www.clac-comerciojusto.org
COMMUNIQUÉ ON THE FAIR TRADE SITUATION  IN THE UNITED STATES– a look back at the last six months

Directed to: Members of Small Producer Organisations In Latin America and the Caribbean

Dear SPO members and other stakeholders,

As you know, Fairtrade USA (previously known as TRANSFAIR USA) announced its departure
from the International FLO system on the 15th of September 2011.  According to FT USA’s
declarations, its departure was due to irreparable disagreements with FLO relating to licence
payments and production system extension projects within Fairtrade, which did not concord
with FLO philosophy. With respect to this, CLAC declared its views through public communiqués at different times (the 22nd of September and the 7th of October, 2011) and also participated in the writing of
a CAN communiqué (CAN is an alliance consisting of three continental networks of producers
from Latin America and the Caribbean, [CLAC], Africa [AFN] and Asia [NAP]), central theme of
which was to make it known that CLAC did not agree with FT USA’s new vision of expansion,
for the following reasons:

  • Over the years CLAC has declared that it does NOT conform to Fairtrade (FLO) changes  with regard to the entrance of production systems such as plantations, contract production and other growth models, which affect the interests and the future of Small Producer Organisations.
  • CLAC does not support FT USA in its mission and growth strategy, much less its new stance on excluding Producer Networks from decision-making processes.
  • CLAC will continue to carry out advocacy work in order to defend our position within the Global Fairtrade System and to demand respect for what was agreed upon at the White Paper, that market growth must never affect organised small producers.  

Similarly, on the 15th of October, 2011, CLAC also participated in a panel discussion together with FLO International and FT USA in order to present some of the consequences that would affect small producers as a result of this separation and FT USA’s new vision of expantion, summarised in the following points:

  • The expansion of Fair Trade based on the theory that the entrance of other actors into the system (plantations and producers who do not form part of organisations) will generate more benefits for small producers goes against the market reality and the basic principles of fair trade.  
  • Fairtrade certified producers only export a third of their production  in Fairtrade conditions (FLO GPM data, 108,000/358,000 TM) and for this reason it cannot be argued that there is not a sufficient supply of small producers to provide the Fair Trade market.  
  • The only way to empower small producers is through their forming organisations.  Other methods generate dependency.
  • An “extended” vision of Fairtrade would result in less participation from small producers (displacement), the weakening of SPOs, and an increase in unfair competition.
  • The growth in supply and the entrance of other competitors into the system will also be to the detriment of prices, whereby the security of a minimum price and a premium threatens to disappear.  
  • Confusion is being generated among consumers in the north, who are no longer aware which products come from small producers and which come from plantations, nor which come from  transnational corporations buying from individual  producers under contract production rules.

During this event and other moments, CLAC also raised questions for FLO on whether or not the FLO International system will begin to follow a new concept of market growth, independently of what the producers might think and on how FLO would help SPOs to prevent them from losing out in the United States market.
On the other hand, and as part of CLAC’s stance, the CLAC Coffee Network had to suspend the Technical Ascendance and Training Agreement signed with FT USA at the beginning of  2011 – before FT USA announced with departure from the system.  This decision was made in order to avoid misunderstandings between our partners or regarding the industry and, as a result, have to give up a right acquired through our contributions to the system, which would have affected the services we provide to small producers and with the knowledge that such a decision would not stop FT USA from carrying out its activities and, with these resources, having greater opportunities work with SPOs, visit their countries, and achieve higher levels of information manipulation without CLAC’s presence and vigilance.Coordinadora Latinoamericana y del Caribe de Pequeños Productores de Comercio Justo, CLAC Latin American and Caribbean Network of Small Fair Trade Producers, CLAC

For its part, since the announcement of FT USA’s new direction, FLO International has been trying to find  solutions to the conflict and to transmit calm to SPOs by  communicating with them directly.  In this context, FLO International even considered signing a memorandum of understanding in order to create an alliance with FT USA in which FLO Cert could also provide certificates for FT USA’s “Fair Trade for all” system, avoiding in this way many of the medium and long term negative consequences for Small Producer Organisations (such as: greater confusion for consumers and the destruction of the small producer  model of collective cooperatives and associations).  However, the conditions made by FLO International in order to come to an agreement were not accepted by FT USA (as one of the conditions was to pay back the amount FT USA  owed to the FLO International system).  As  a result, over recent weeks these actors have decided not to sign any agreements.

During the last week of  February, 2012, a meeting took place  between the United States industry and FLO International, in which CLAC also participated actively, in order to search for a  viable way of jointly rescuing the Fair Trade market in the United States in which it was decided to create a platform with interested civil society actors and producers to help rescue the original values of Fair Trade in the United States and not to leave the road open for FT USA to use its definition of “inclusive fair trade and philosophy of social justice” to do more
damage to the organised small producer model.  

In the following months, CLAC commits to remaining involved and to keeping a vigil to ensure that the interests of SPOs are defended and included in this new platform and to continue fighting for our assembly’s mandate and not allowing new production models that go against small producers to go ahead in the International Fair Trade system and to promote our Small Producers’ Symbol.  

Written in San Salvador, El Salvador, on the twenty-sixth of March of 2012.

JUNTA DIRECTIVA CLAC

FacebookTwitterGoogle+EmailShare

Fair Trade for Farmers and Soil

Plowing field with oxen

Small-scale organic farming and regenerative agricultural practices combat our climate crisis and help feed the world. Here are just a few of the ways that fair trade producers and their brand partners are collaborating to grow ethical supply chains through regenerative organic agricultural methods, and producing goods that we can all feel good about. This […]

The Hidden History Made at Sakuma Brothers Farms

Picking blueberries: Copyright David Bacon

History was made on September 12, 2016 with the election of Familias Unidas por la Justicia to be the union representing berry pickers at Sakuma Brothers Farms in Washington state. Three perspectives on what that means for farmworkers, farmers, and our food system. History was made on September 12, 2016 with the election of Familias […]

Food Waste, Hunger and Climate Change

Food Wastage Footprint and Climate Change, Rome FAQ

As a child, you likely heard some variation of the cliché, “Eat all your food; there are starving people in the world.” While hunger remains one of humanity’s greatest challenges, the underlying causes are not as clear as one might think. Written by Ryan Zinn As a child, you likely heard some variation of the […]

Fair Cannabis?

Trimming

For decades, workers have flocked to Northern California and Southern Oregon to work the fall cannabis harvest. Some are migrants on their seasonal tour. Others are driven by an interest in cannabis culture, or by the promise of lucrative pay. While some “trimmers” have had pleasant, safe and profitable experiences, many have not. Written by […]

Sustainable Public Procurement:

Sustainable Public Procurement

An Understated and Effective Way to Grow Fair Trade Sales of fair trade products have grown in leaps and bounds, especially in Europe. While this growth is encouraging, supply from producers in the Global South is well ahead of demand from consumers in the North. How do we close this gap? Here’s a practical guide […]

Trading Down: How Unfair Trade Hurts Farmers

United States farm incomes sharply declined in 2016 for the third year in a row. Prices for wheat and corn are currently at ten-year lows, and in many cases U.S. farmers are paid below the cost of production for what they produce. While these low prices hurt U.S. farmers, when the crops are exported by […]

Grow Ahead: Crowdfunding Climate Resilience

Fair World Project is launching Grow Ahead, an online crowdfunding platform. For the first time, individual consumers can forge an intimate link with front-line farmer groups, directly funding farmer initiatives and supporting the global effort to address climate change on the farm. Industrial agriculture and food production is a major contributor to climate change, and […]

Fair Cities

cities_minnesota

    What will the just economy of the future look like? We asked for your suggestions for cities across North America that are living examples of fair trade values in action. Is yours on the list? MINNEAPOLIS/ST PAUL, Minnesota Minneapolis-St. Paul is a hotbed of fair trade activity. For decades now, local nonprofits like the […]

It’s Time for Wages With Dignity

timeforwage02

by Ryan Johnson Quietly, hidden behind the headlines that feature presidential candidates bemoaning the state of our country and our economy, voters in several states are no longer waiting on politicians. They’re taking matters into their own hands and launching minimum wage ballot initiatives to create the economic change people sorely need. The impetus for […]

The Business Case for Raising the Minimum Wage

businesscase01

by David Bronner At Dr. Bronner’s, the company I run with my family, we believe that we can only prosper in the long run if we contribute to the prosperity of society as a whole. It’s why we strive to compensate all our staff fairly, cap executive compensation at five times the lowest paid position, […]